en English
ar Arabiczh-CN Chinese (Simplified)nl Dutchen Englishfr Frenchde Germanit Italianpt Portugueseru Russianes Spanish

Office of the Vermont Attorney General

Rutland City Police Officer Will Not Be Prosecuted For Non-Fatal Officer-Involved Shooting

November 24, 2020

Use of force analyzed under both current Vermont law and new statute

RUTLAND – Attorney General T.J. Donovan today announced that his office concluded its review of the officer-involved shooting that occurred on July 8, 2020, in Rutland, Vermont. The Attorney General’s Office is declining to prosecute Rutland City Police Department Officer Tyler Billings, who was responsible for the non-fatal shooting of Michael Goodnough, 45, Rutland, Vermont. Based on the facts and circumstances, and consistent with Vermont law, the Attorney General’s Office has concluded that the actions of Officer Billings were justified. In anticipation of Vermont’s new statute addressing use of force by police officers, the lawfulness of this shooting was also analyzed under Act 165, which goes into effect on July 1, 2021 and was modeled after a California statute. Under the new statute, the use of force would also have been justified because, based on the totality of the circumstances, it was both reasonable and necessary to protect Officer Nathan Harvey from an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury.

In reaching today’s decision, the Attorney General’s Office reviewed all the materials provided by the Vermont State Police, who conducted the investigation. These materials included statements of the officers involved and civilian witnesses, video footage, and a ballistics examination of the weapon used to carry out the shooting.

On July 7, 2020, the Rutland City Police Department’s Street Crimes Unit, which consisted of Sgt. Adam Lucia, Cpl. Elias Anderson, and Officer Billings, received information that Robert Vandriel was selling drugs out of the Travel Inn in Rutland. Sgt. Lucia ran Mr. Vandriel’s name through a police database and determined that he had a prior arrest as well as other interactions with law enforcement. Sgt. Lucia also obtained a photo of Mr. Vandriel. Sgt. Lucia then reached out to Mr. Vandriel via Facebook Messenger. Using an alias, Sgt. Lucia arranged to buy a gram of crack cocaine from Mr. Vandriel later that night at the Tops parking lot in at the intersection of Terrill Street and South Main Street in Rutland.

Sgt. Lucia contacted Rutland County Deputy State’s Attorney Ian Sullivan and sought his advice about buying crack cocaine from Mr. Vandriel. Deputy State’s Attorney Sullivan said that based on the information the police had, they were close to being able to successfully apply for a search warrant if the drug sale did not happen as planned. The officers then came up with a plan that if Mr. Vandriel arrived alone, they would talk to him to see if he would cooperate. If he did not arrive alone, the plan was to call in two uniformed police officers, Officer Nathan Harvey and Officer Elizha Heter, who would be stationed nearby. The officers would then detain Mr. Vandriel, seize the vehicle, and apply for a search warrant. The unit had no information that Mr. Vandriel possessed weapons, that there would be anyone else with him, or that he would be armed.

That night, Sgt. Lucia, Cpl. Anderson, and Officer Billings went to the Terrill Street lot in a white Ford pickup truck and waited. Officer Billings was in the driver’s seat and Cpl. Anderson and Sgt. Lucia were in the back. Sgt. Lucia and Cpl. Anderson were wearing vests with the word “POLICE” clearly written on front and back. Officer Billings was in plain clothes. No one was wearing a body camera. The plan was to have Officer Billings approach Mr. Vandriel to do the drug deal when he arrived. At around 11:30 pm, just when the Street Crimes Unit was about to end the operation, Mr. Vandriel contacted Sgt. Lucia and said he was on his way. Shortly after midnight, a vehicle with Mr. Vandriel and another occupant arrived and circled the lot. Because there was more than one person in the car, the officers decided to call in the patrol units.

The suspect’s vehicle then parked behind them and Sgt. Lucia heard someone in the truck say that Mr. Vandriel had gotten out of the car. Sgt. Lucia opened the back door of the truck and saw Mr. Vandriel standing near the front of the car. Once the marked cruisers arrived, Sgt. Lucia, Cpl. Anderson, and Officer Billings exited the truck. Mr. Vandriel had exited the car on the passenger side and Cpl. Anderson identified himself as a police officer. Mr. Vandriel then went back to the open passenger door. Cpl. Anderson thought that he was taking something out of his pants, so he yelled, “show me your hands.” Sgt. Lucia also shouted, “Rutland Police. Show me your hands” and drew his weapon. Mr. Vandriel then started climbing back into the vehicle without saying anything. Cpl. Anderson then grabbed Mr. Vandriel around his waist to try to prevent him from getting back in. As Sgt. Anderson was holding Mr. Vandriel, the vehicle lurched backward, and the door hit Cpl. Anderson. Cpl. Anderson thought he had fallen down, but could not be sure. The next thing Cpl. Anderson remembered was climbing over a knee-high fence after the vehicle passed him. Cpl. Anderson then thinks he got into another struggle with Mr. Vandriel to try to get Mr. Vandriel out of the vehicle.

Meanwhile, Officer Harvey, who had arrived at the scene a few minutes earlier, and had exited his cruiser, heard a sound from the suspect’s vehicle of someone turning the key in the ignition of an engine that had already started. Thinking that the driver (later identified as Michael Goodnough) was going to flee and that it would be dangerous to everyone there, Officer Harvey  went to the driver’s side door, opened it, and told the driver to get out of the car. Officer Harvey did not give any other commands and did not recall identifying himself as a police officer then or at any other time.

Officer Harvey then saw the driver reach for the shifter with his right hand and was concerned he was going to put the car in drive. Officer Harvey reached over the driver’s back and tried to grab his right arm to prevent him from doing so. The vehicle then began to reverse really quickly. With the door open, Officer Harvey had nowhere to go. He looked behind at his cruiser and thought he had to do to something so that he would not get crushed when the two cars collided. However, Officer Harvey did not remember what happened next.

The next thing Officer Harvey remembered was lying on the ground underneath what he assumed was the suspect’s vehicle. Simultaneously, he heard gun shots (coming from one area), but he could not say how many he heard. Officer Harvey then crawled or rolled out from underneath the vehicle and realized that the suspect’s vehicle had left. He did not know how many shots had been fired or if the suspect’s vehicle was moving when the shots were fired. He then saw the suspect’s vehicle leaving the lot in the direction of Tops.

Officer Heter arrived at the scene shortly after Officer Harvey. Moments after she arrived, Officer Heter saw the suspect’s vehicle (which she described as an SUV) backing up, hitting a fence, and then stopping. It took her a few seconds to realize that Officer Harvey had been entangled with the SUV as it was moving backward. Next, she saw Officer Harvey hit the windshield of his cruiser and bounce back and hit the ground. He rolled when he hit the ground, hit the fence, and then came to a rest underneath the SUV between the front and rear driver’s side tires. Officer Heter thought Officer Harvey was going to get run over, but the SUV stopped.

Based on what she had seen, Officer Heter thought Officer Harvey had been killed. Then she heard three to five shots go off in rapid succession (later she said that she was not sure when exactly she heard the shots, but it must have been after Officer Harvey hit the ground). Officer Heter did not know at the time whether the person shooting was a police officer or was in the SUV.

Officer Heter thought the SUV stopped only because it hit the fence. The car then pulled out of the lot and her first instinct was to chase it. However, she instead went to check on Officer Harvey. She went over to where she expected to see him dead, but Officer Harvey was gone. She then saw Officer Harvey get into his cruiser and go after the SUV.

At the time the SUV started to back up, Officer Billings recalled seeing Officer Harvey running to the driver’s side door, which was partially open, and appearing to try to rip the driver out of his seat. Officer Billings then saw the SUV reverse at a high rate of speed, and it appeared to him that Officer Harvey was stuck in the door and was being dragged backwards by the SUV. Next, Officer Billings saw the SUV and Officer Harvey hit Officer Harvey’s patrol car, and then the SUV backed through a fence. At this point, Officer Billings was about 5-10 yards from the SUV at an offset. He then saw Officer Harvey lying on the ground near the front driver’s side tire of the SUV and it appeared part of Officer Harvey’s body was under the vehicle. Officer Billings thought that Officer Harvey had been crushed when the SUV struck his cruiser and that he had been severely injured.

The SUV then started moving forward at which time Officer Billings fired his gun (already drawn) at the driver. Officer Billings did not announce anything prior to firing and believed that he had fired approximately 5-9 times. He fired his weapon because he thought that Officer Harvey’s life was in danger, adding that Officer Harvey was in danger of serious bodily injury or death. Officer Billings advised that he wanted to incapacitate the driver and stop the threat to Officer Harvey. Officer Billings stopped shooting when he believed that the driver was no longer a threat to Officer Harvey’s life.

The SUV accelerated rapidly and exited the lot. Officer Billings ran after it and saw it turn onto South Main Street. He then ran back to the scene expecting to see Officer Harvey dead. Officer Billings thought Officer Harvey had been run over and killed or least seriously injured, and was  confused not to see Officer Harvey there. Cpl. Anderson and Sgt. Lucia were walking around and did not immediately know where Officer Harvey had gone to.

Unbeknownst to Officer Billings, Officer Harvey had seen Officer Billings run after the suspect vehicle. Upon seeing Officer Billings pointing southbound, Officer Harvey went back to his cruiser and turned on his blue lights and siren and followed the suspect vehicle. He soon saw the suspect’s vehicle crashed at the intersection of Jackson Avenue and South Main Street.

Officer Harvey grabbed his dog and exited his cruiser. He saw Mr. Vandriel, who was in the vehicle with the driver, was trying to get out of the vehicle. Officer Harvey ordered Mr. Vandriel to the ground, who complied and was handcuffed.

Shortly thereafter, Cpl. Anderson received word that the SUV had crashed at Jackson Avenue. He, Stg. Lucia, and Officer Billings got into their truck and drove there immediately. When they arrived, they saw that the SUV had crashed, and a male was in custody. They then saw Officer Harvey administering first aid to the driver until EMTs arrived at the scene. Both occupants of the SUV were taken to the Rutland Regional Medical Center. The driver had sustained a number of gunshot wounds. Mr. Vandriel was not shot, but sustained injuries in the crash. Both individuals survived.

It was later determined, based on video from the scene including two cruiser dashcam videos and footage from a nearby business, a ballistics examination, and the round count of the weapon used in the shooting, that Officer Billings had fired his weapon eight times in rapid succession as Officer Harvey was lying on the ground inches from the suspect’s vehicle. There is no evidence that any of the other officers discharged their weapons.

Under Vermont law, the killing or wounding of someone is justified in order to defend the life of another person. The so-called defense of others doctrine provides that a person “is justified in using reasonable force in defense of another person, even a stranger, when he reasonably believes that the other is in immediate danger of unlawful bodily harm from his adversary and that the use of such force is necessary to avoid this danger.” (Information about this doctrine may be found in the Vermont Supreme Court case, State v. Buckley, 2016 VT 59, ¶ 19, 202 Vt. 371.)

In this case, Officer Billings witnessed the driver reversing his SUV at a high rate of speed and dragging Officer Harvey by the open driver’s door. Officer Billings then saw the vehicle collide with Officer Harvey’s cruiser and a wooden fence, leaving Officer Harvey lying on the ground near the front tire of the SUV. Officer Billings said that it appeared to him at this time that part of Officer Harvey’s body was underneath the SUV. Officer Billings then saw the SUV start to move forward. It was at that moment that Officer Billings shot into the SUV eight times, in rapid succession, targeting the driver. When Officer Billings was asked why he had shot the driver, he said he believed that Officer Harvey’s life was in danger and that he was trying to incapacitate the driver in order to remove the threat to Officer Harvey.

Applying the defense of others test outlined in Buckley to these facts and circumstances, it is clear that Officer Billings’ shooting of the was justified. First, at the time of the shooting, Officer Billings held a reasonable belief that Officer Harvey’s life was in imminent danger from the driver. This belief was based on the fact that Officer Harvey was lying on the ground close to the front driver side tire of the suspect’s vehicle as it started to move forward. It was also based on the fact that Officer Billings had just witnessed the driver drag Officer Harvey several feet by the door of his vehicle and collide with Officer Harvey’s cruiser and a fence. Second, shooting the driver was the only option Officer Billings had to incapacitate the driver. The time that elapsed from when Officer Harvey was dragged by the suspect’s vehicle until Officer Billings shot him was approximately seven seconds. There was no time to try other options to remove the threat to Officer Harvey’s life such as verbal commands, de-escalation tactics, or non-lethal force. Therefore, shooting the driver was proportional in light of the circumstances and the only reasonable way to try to remove the danger to Officer Harvey’s life. Moreover, once Officer Billings realized that the driver was no longer a threat to Officer Harvey, he stopped shooting. Therefore, Officer Billings’ shooting of the driver was justifiable. Accordingly, the State of Vermont would be unable to sustain its burden of proving aggravated assault or any other criminal charge against Officer Billings beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, the Attorney General’s Office is declining to file charges against Officer Billings.

The lawfulness of this shooting was also analyzed under a new Vermont statute that addresses deadly use of force by police officers and is set to go into effect on July 1, 2021. Based on that statute, the use of deadly force was also justified because under the totality of the circumstances of this case, such force was objectively reasonable and necessary to defend Officer Harvey against an imminent threat of serious bodily injury. As noted above, when Officer Billings deployed his weapon, Officer Harvey was lying on the ground just inches away from the front wheel of the suspect’s vehicle as the vehicle began to move forward. Moreover, Officer Billings had just witnessed Officer Harvey being dragged by the open door of the suspect’s vehicle, which he then saw collide with Officer Harvey’s cruiser, throwing him to the ground. Under the totality of these circumstances, a reasonable officer in Officer Billings’ position would undoubtedly have concluded that there was an imminent threat to Officer Harvey’s life and that to save his life, there was no reasonable alternative to the use of deadly force. Moreover, once the driver no longer posed a threat to Officer’s Harvey’s life, Officer Billing stopped deploying his weapon. Therefore, applying the standard of Act 165 would have the same conclusion: Officer Billings’ use of deadly force in this case was justified.

Windham County State’s Attorney Tracy Kelly Shriver, who reviewed this matter for the Rutland County State’s Attorney’s Office, also conducted an independent, concurrent review of the same materials and has also declined to file charges against Officer Billings.

Last modified: November 24, 2020